Terrorists Attack: a Media Analysis :: essays research papers

Psychological militants Attack!! Â Â Â Â Â February 26, 1993, the day that psychological militants made the greatest assault on American soil to that point. It was early evening on a Friday, 12:18 pm to be precise, a vehicle bomb tore through the guts of the now notorious North World Trade Center twin pinnacle. It happened rapidly, and all of a sudden, ordinary individuals were just approaching their every day business, when out of nowhere, the structure shook, the force went out, and smoke started to fill each of the 110 stories of the towers. Many thought about what had occurred, had a plane struck the structure, was it a tremor? D, nothing from what was just mentioned, some crazed crazy person had chosen to slaughter 5 individuals and harm a lot progressively just to get some point over. Â Â Â Â Â This occasion graced the first page of papers and news magazines the nation over, the New York Times was the paper nearest to the activity. Covrage in this paper was distributed one day after the occasion, and coverednot just the occasion however the resulting traffic confusion it caused. Being a paper nearby to New York City, the site of the assault, the newpaper took into account the interests of its neighborhood perusers. The New York Times, be that as it may, is additionally circled around the nation, and around the globe. This required the newpaper editors, distributers, and essayists to stay delicate to the emotions and contemplations of perusers in the more extensive understanding crowd. Â Â Â Â Â Newsweek Magazine additionally distributed inclusion of the assault. Their essential crowd is a national one, and subsequently, the inclusion is intended for a more extensive crowd. Additionally, seeing as the magazine is just distributed once every week, instead of day by day as the New York Times, Newsweek had more opportunity to assemble realities and proof. This additional time for research drives more to a reality based inclusion than an inquiry based inclusion. Â Â Â Â Â One intriguing perception is that it appears to be the two sources quickly expect that remote fear based oppressors were the essential culprits of this assault. Neither one of the articles comes directly out and says it, anyway both are fairly uncertain about it. Newsweek makes reference to the chance of a household hotspot for the viciousness, yet invests substantially more energy and exertion clarifying the conceivable remote sources. Generally the two articles appear to be somewhat direct in their portrayal of the occasion, and remain rather oversimplified, so as not to confound the understanding crowd. Â Â Â Â Â When an occasion of this extent happens, feelings will undoubtedly assume a job in the inclusion.

George and Lennie Essay

The title of the book originates from a sonnet by the eighteenth century Scottish writer Robert Burns. â€Å"Of Mice and Men† is a novel composed by John Steinbeck. It is set in California in 1930s during the hour of the downturn. During this season of melancholy, individuals lived in destitution, thinking that its hard to pick up work and frequently needed to scan farm to farm for business. Right now individuals were enlivened and persuaded by the â€Å"American dream† a fantasy of a land wherein life ought to be better and more extravagant. This, anyway was only a lost dream. They proceeded to look for an occupation, which would fullfill, their fantasies. In Of Mice and Men we realize that there are characters that have a fantasy. A fantasy that they are truly buckling down for and there are characters whose fantasies are as of now detracted from them. I think John Steinbeck composed this so he can furnish the peruser with an authentic and social perspective and foundation of life during the 1930s. An untouchable is somebody who doesn't fit in to the standard of Society. In this article I will expound on Candy, the most established individual on the ranch. Convicts, the injured Negro and Cuerly’s spouse, the main ladies in the book, who didn't get a name. I have picked them since they don’t fit in with different characters. During the 1930s Curleys Wife speaks to individuals who were disregarded and experienced depression. Above all else John Steinbeck doesn't uncover the name of Curley’s Wife as he might suspect she isn't significant which makes me believe that she has no other part to play other than being Curleys Wife. Curly’s Wife is stuck on a homestead when she figures she ought to be in Hollywood. Â

Market segmentation of Wesfarmers Samples †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Examine about the Market division of Wesfarmers. Answer: Market Segmentation Market division alludes to the procedure that is utilized in the division of an expansive client base or the business showcase that comprises of the different potential just as the current clients of the concerned business association. The market is separated into the different sub-gatherings or sub-divisions that are known as the sections of the worry. The division is commonly founded on the different stages that appear to be normal among the individuals who have been clubbed under one single class (Guo et al., 2013). These elements may remember the similitude for the ways of life of the individuals or in the segment profiles of the concerned individuals. Different issues that are remembered for these variables are the regular interests and the mutual needs of the concerned individuals from the general public. The significant point of the procedure of the division is to advanced the creation and the ID of the different high return sections of the market wherein the concerned organiz ation may have been working. These high return sections by and large allude to the different regions that show the most likeliness in the productivity of the worry or may show the more noteworthy potential for the development later on. The significant thought process behind the determination of these territories is to give uncommon consideration to these zones with the goal that they may assist the concerned organization with growing the positive way (Rogerson, 2013). The division of the market is commonly founded on different variables that may incorporate the accompanying. The assets of the organization The organization may advance the execution of a serious and the powerful division plan in the cases at whatever point there is a limitation in the measure of the assets that the concerned organization may present. The fluctuation of the items Themarketing approach of the items may be subject to the consistency and the differentiability of the different items that are fabricated by the concerned organization (Kiel, 2014). The life-pattern of the items The division of the items will in general be fundamental during the time wherein the organization may need to manage a colossal number of the contenders for the concerned items. The attributes of the operational market The organization needs to advance the assortment in the division of themarketing approach wherein the different customers do delineate the distinction in their preferences. Rivalry in the market The concerned organization may need to portray the different division approaches in the market wherein the contenders of the association will in general set forth the utilization of the different division approaches so as to fortify their customer base (Zolnowski, Wei Bohmann, 2014). The division of the concerned market may be reliant on the different components like the variables that are identified with the demography of the concerned market, the land area of the concerned market, the psychographical states of the client and the conduct inclinations of the given clients (Jary Wileman, 2016). These elements will in general hugy affect the market division moves toward that are trailed by the different business associations. The social division of the association causes the organization to manage the different objective customers based on the conduct that they will in general set forth while buying a specific item or administration. As per certain advertisers, it may be said that the social factors that are identified with the division of the concerned market are of higher incentive than the different issues that relate to the demographical and the topographical variables that are vital for the division of the concerned market of the association. The different components that may be named as the social elements incorporate the event of the buy, the advantage that the concerned client may look for from the concerned item or administration, the status of the concerned client, the recurrence of the buy by the concerned purchaser, the faithfulness of the concerned customer, the availability of the concerned purchaser, the disposition of the concerned customer to the concerned assistance or item and the statu s of selection that is exhibited by the concerned customer towards the item or administration (Laudon Traver, 2013). The conduct division as showed by the Australian retail magnet, Wesfarmers, manages the customers who significantly will in general purchase the basic food item things. The retail magnet is additionally seen to provide food the different individuals who will in general shop for the items that are identified with the items that may be required for meeting the different necessities of the family unit and the way of life that is driven by the concerned individuals from the customer base. The retail magnet, employable significantly on Australia, may likewise need to manage the different customers who may be requiring the different parts that are required for the correct working of the autos that are possessed by the concerned organization. The segment division of the market relies on the different demographical factors that are shown by the different customers of the concerned association. The specialists who have been upholding for the segment division are of the supposition that the customers having a place with the segment profile that bear similitude to one another might exhibit comparability in their buy designs, interests, ways of life and their inspirational variables. These, as indicated by the specialists may thusly prompt the comparability in the inclinations of the brands, items and the administrations that the different organizations offer in the given market (Han et al., 2014). The different elements that may be viewed as the segment elements would incorporate the variables that relate to the age of the customer, the family size of the concerned customer, the financial status of the concerned customers, the monetary status of the concerned customer, the instructive accomplishment of the concerned customer, the conjugal status of the customer, the ethnicity of the customer, the strict foundation of the customers and other such factors. The segment division of the concerned organization may require the intercession of the registration gatherers of the legislature and on occasion the different administrative bodies that manage the records of the residents of the nation (Weinstein Cahill, 2014). The segment division of the organization may likewise be influenced by the land division of the nation. The segment division of the organization may utilize various measures of the factors that may be identified with the demography of the concerned nation. The geological division of the organization may identify with the division of the customers based on the topographical measures of the land. The land matters that may be utilized to portion the business sectors may comprehensively fragment the business sectors based on the nations wherein the customer base whenever found and in the smaller range may allude to the different neighborhoods and the postal codes of the regions wherein there is most of the objective clients of the nation (Wilkinson, 2013). The geological issues relating to the division of the customer base of the organization may be joined with the segment factors so as to accommodate better itemizing of the objective customer profiles of the concerned organization, Wesfarmers for this situation. The psychographic division of the customer base of the concerned organization may allude to the divisions that depend on the exercises, the interests and the sentiments that are kept up by the demographic of the concerned association. The psychographic division of the customer base is now and again alluded to as the way of life or the psychometric division of the concerned customer base of the association. The psychographic division is commonly founded on the inclinations of the customers regarding the manners in which that they pick so as to spend their relaxation hours and the different outside components that may impact their choices and inclinations. Most of the organizations will in general submit to the psychographic division of their customer base since it causes them in the ID of the market section and accordingly encourages them in shaping a superior comprehension of the different issues that serve to be inspirations for the given demographic of the worry. Market Targeting The market focusing on for the most part alludes to the procedure of the determination of the objective market from the whole market that exists for the concerned market. The objective market of the concerned organization may identify with the different gatherings of the customers the requirements of whom the organization means to meet. The objective market of the business generally incorporates the customers of organization towards whom the different items are focused, for whom the cost of the concerned item is characterized (Weinstein, 2014). The special exercises are likewise coordinated towards this picked potential customers of the organization. The different distributional stations of the organization are likewise coordinated to the different picked customer base of the concerned business association. The action of the market focusing on might allude to the assessment of the different sections of the market and from that point picking the most fitting portion of the market that is most appropriate for the concerned business association. In this manner, the market focusing on may be characterized as the action of the division of the whole market into the different sections, the assessment of the concerned portions and the choice of the most suitable fragment of the market as the objective market of the concerned organization (Hjort et al., 2013). The focusing of the market may include various advances that are essential for the determination of the most suitable portion of the market that may help in the development of the benefits that are earned by the organization. The procedure of the focusing of the market includes the lead

A Natural Mirror of Impurity - Literature Essay Samples

The entity of Nature acts as a double-edged sword in Nathaniel Hawthornes The Scarlet Letter. In the novel, Nature shows its ability to both harm and heal through its effects on the characters. The novel highlights Natures complexity by showing that the Puritan idea of Nature as an entirely evil force is a naive misconception. The text reveals the beneficial attributes of Nature that the Puritans overlook or fear. Conversely, the text shows that aspects of Nature that help mankind also harm him. The duality and complexity of Nature mirrors the complex inner feelings and dual nature of the books characters. Nature represents the paradoxical juxtaposition of both good and evil in man, by showing both good and evil attributes in itself. Ultimately, Nature reveals mans inherent inability to be pure.By presenting a number of aspects of Nature that are beneficial to man, the text manages to discount the one-sided Puritanical view of Nature as an utterly evil influence. Nature provide s both Hestor and Dimmesdale with some feelings of restoration and relief by giving them a sense of freedom from society. When surrounded only by society and separated from Nature, Dimmesdale festers. He withdraws into his study or within himself, places where he can only breathe his own polluted breath(128). He longs to at last draw free air(128) and to live life without the burden of his guilt, the burden of his society. He first achieves this feeling of freedom during his long walks on the seashore or in the forest(119) with Chillingworth. Dimmesdale describes his relief and joy in conversing with another human outside the typical sphere of society as the feeling that a window were thrown open, admitting a freer atmosphere into the close and stifled study where his life was wasting away(120). Significantly, this sense of freedom occurs for Dimmesdale while he is out in Nature, away from the confines of society. The text metaphorically compares Dimmesdales sense of freedom to the relieving sensation of breathing fresh air. The idea of receiving fresh air alludes to the act of escaping confinement. It represents freedom from oppressive, dank, decaying ideas and institutions. By using metaphors that compare Nature to freedom Hawthorne highlights the positive side of Nature, and Hawthorne reveals Natures ability to provide relief and release.Significantly, Dimmesdale does not repeat the experience of release until he is in the forest again. The forest, as a representative of nature, lets Dimmesdale out of his self-imposed isolation, and the isolation of the Puritan community. While surrounded by Nature he experiences the exhilarating effect of breathing [a] wild, free atmosphere(198). The feeling affects him as though he were a prisoner just escaped from the dungeon of his own heart(198). Nature provides him with relief and comfort from the oppressive Puritan society of Salem, as well as from the burden of his guilt. Since Nature is an unredeeme d, unchristianized, lawless region(198), Dimmesdale can temporarily distance himself from his ties to society and the guilt those ties impose upon him. In this way, Nature acts as a place for Dimmesdale to air out his true self, to feel release, and to sense the presence of a world outside himself and outside of Salem.Nature similarly provides Hestor with a sense of freedom from the oppression of society. Being surrounded by the sea instead of by the town distances her from the oppressive societal influences of Salem. This distance allows her to gain insights that she could not have gained in the stifling air of the Puritan town. By living in a lonesome cottage near the sea shore(161), a place representative of Nature, she is able to conjure thoughts such as dared to enter no other dwelling in New England(161). She manages to view the world in terms the Puritans do not understand. Her separation from Puritan society allows her to comprehend the important and inherent contradict ions and duality within herself and others. She glimpses these contradictions during her brief interactions with the town when she senses the secret guilt other seemingly righteous people carry in their hearts. Her separation from her society allows her the perspective that is necessary to sense the duality in others. Her isolation from society amidst the freeing influence of Nature releases her from the restrictions that determine what is acceptable to believe, allowing her mind to roam as freely as the wild Indian in his woods(196). Her estranged point of view, her fate and fortunes, as well as her isolation by the seashore set her free(196) and give her insight. This freedom shows Natures ability to bestow beneficial influences on mankind, dispelling the idea that Nature can only be a force of evil.However, the novel forces the reader to recognize Natures negative aspects as well as its positive ones. Just as isolation leads Hestor to recognize complexities and contradictio ns in herself and others, so the novel leads the reader to recognize complexities in all things, including Nature. The text shows that although Nature possesses positive attributes, its detrimental aspects check and taint its otherwise beneficial ones. Dimmesdale does indeed enjoy the benefits of drawing free air(128) while surrounded by Nature, but the text insists that the air is too fresh and chill to be long breathed with comfort(120). The fact that the fresh air at first heals Dimmesdale but then harms him after an extended period of exposure to it, shows the duality of Nature. Likewise, Nature reveals its complexity through the plants with healing balm in them(119) that it produces. Chillingworth collects these plants on his walks with Dimmesdale. Significantly, they are beneficial to the body only in the correct dosage. When administered incorrectly they can be poisonous. Additionally, the plants that Nature produces do prolong Dimmesdales life, but to Dimmesdale this is cruelty. Therefore, Nature manages to harm Dimmesdale despite the healing relief it also gave him.Similarly to the way that Dimmesdales soul finds relief in Nature, Hestors intellect and heart find respite in desert places(196), or natural places. Hawthornes use of the term desert signifies that Hestor finds her respite in a place where she can be free of men, laws, and oppression. By using the word desert, he highlights the way Hestors situation both isolates her and brings her close to Nature. This isolation and proximity to Nature gives her freedom, creative inspiration, and release. However, as the word desert suggests, she also suffers from her isolation. Despite the overwhelming freedom a desert offers, it is ultimately too isolated, too harsh and too dry to be completely beneficial to a human soul. As the desert metaphor suggests, an excess of exposure to the freedom of Nature inevitably leads Hestor amiss(196). The text emphasizes with this metaphor, as well as wi th the fact that fresh air is too chill to be breathed for long, and that healing plants can be poisons, that too much of a curative substance can be harmful. As a force, Nature provides freedom and release, especially for Hestor and Dimmesdale. However, when experienced in excess, or when not diluted by the forces of society, it is not an entirely positive or harmless influence.The main danger of Nature for Hestor and Dimmesdale is its isolating influence on them. Being alone in the forest separates them from the civilizing and moralizing influences of society. The intense seclusion of the forest(184) leads both Hestor and Dimmesdale to disregard the morals of society, and tempts them to sin anew. The effects of this isolation and demoralization surface while they are in the forest. Hestor throws her scarlet letter among the withered leaves(198). She abandons all the mores and principles of her society with this gesture, because in this section the scarlet letter symbolizes s ocietys influence on her. Similarly, Dimmesdale metaphorically flings his sick, sin-stained, and sorrow-blackened (198) self down upon these forest leaves(198) and rises up all made anew(198). However, the birth of this new self only occurs through the abandonment of his former societal self. The isolation and wildness of Nature causes Hestor and Dimmesdale to believe they can leave their societal duties and selves behind without consequence, and happily renew their sinful relationship. Hestor never realizes the error of their decision because she has been for so long a period not merely estranged, but outlawed from society(195) and entangled in the moral wilderness(196) of Nature. Due to her long seclusion from society(156) she has been unable to measure her ideas of right and wrong by any standard external to herself(156). Therefore, she no longer grasps the concepts of socially accepted morality. Dimmesdale also seems to abandon his societal self in favor of a more lawless one. He feels that another man has returned out of the forest(219), and he now stand[s] apart from his former self(219). He believes he grasps a knowledge of hidden mysteries which the simplicity of the former [self] could never have reached(219). However, once he re-enters the physical limits of what [his] church define[s] as orthodox(120), the physical borders of the town itself, he seems to begin to re-enter into the spiritual and emotional agreements he had with civilized society. The freeing, demoralizing spell of Nature and isolation appears to eventually dissipate because he realizes that he cannot flee his societal obligations, and finally faces the truth of them instead.The borders that Dimmesdale physically and spiritually seems to cross between Nature and society are extremely significant to the townspeople of Salem. The town tries desperately to create strict limits around itself in order to keep the evil of Nature out. In actuality, Salem may be keeping evil with in its borders by isolating itself in the same way Dimmesdale isolates himself within his study and within his mind. Like Dimmesdale, the town has been stifling with [its] own polluted breath(128). The town has little contact with other communities or any other kind[s] of intellect than those with which [they] habitually held converse(120). This isolation breeds religious fervor, fear of the devil in the surrounding forest, and strict intolerance of sin in the Puritan town because it does not allow for an outside influence to check the proliferation of these fears and beliefs. Just as the forest isolates Dimmesdale and Hestor from Salem it isolates Salem from the rest of the world. In Hestors and Dimmesdales cases, the isolation tempts them to abandon society in favor of human weakness. Conversely, Salems isolation leads it to abandon the freedom of human nature in favor of the strict mores of society and religion.This isolation, and the way it causes the Salem townspeople to see things in absolute, black-and-white terms, is the true Black Man lurking in the novel. The townspeople of the text believe that the Black Man haunts the forest(74) around them. The novel, however, does not give any evidence suggesting the actual presence of the Black Man in the forest, but it does suggest that the towns belief in the devils possession of Nature is a danger. Their belief in the devil of the woods causes the Puritans to blindly associate all of Nature with sin, danger, and temptation. Their assumption of evil leaves no room for the possibility of any positive influences to come from the forest. The townspeople, therefore, possess too narrow, and too one-sided a view of Nature. The novel shows that Salems societys tendency to view thing in terms of absolutes extends far beyond their view of Nature. Their willingness to view Nature in terms of absolute evil mirrors their willingness to brand a woman with a scarlet letter and objectify her as the human embodime nt of sin. The text itself presents a dual-sided image of Nature that refutes the citizens one-sided perception and suggests that the reader adopt the same awareness of duality and complexity in all things.In the novel, Nature acts not only as a mirror to societys behaviors but also as a mirror to the characters emotions. Nature reveals the characters innermost feelings to the reader by reflecting them in its own outer aspect. Hestors melancholy spirits during her walk through the woods to meet Dimmesdale are reflected in the chill and sombre(179) weather. The sunlight eludes Hestor in the forest just as happiness eludes her in her life. The text even describes the long sought rays as flitting cheerfulness(179), directly addressing the parallel between the outer world of nature and the inner world of the characters feelings. The subsequent sudden burst of sunshine(199) that pour[s] a very flood(199) of light into the forest when Hestor and Dimmesdale declare their love for on e another mirrors the characters joy at escaping from societys laws and giving in to their true desires. This sunlight is like a sudden smile of heaven(199) that matches the smiles of Hestor and Dimmesdale.Readers may interpret this mirroring as the intense effects of isolation upon Hestor and Dimmesdale. This interpretation implies that the characters narcissistically interpret everything they see, including Nature, in terms relating to themselves1. In many respects the text supports this interpretation. The forest would probably have been bright in Hestors eyes, and bright in Arthur Dimmesdales(200) because of their happiness even if it had kept its gloom(200). However, the text seems to attempt to lead readers toward recognizing the complexities in all things. Therefore, readers may also interpret the reflections Nature seems to make of Hestors feelings and Dimmesdales feelings as more than just meaningless mirror images of the characters facial expressions. The reflectio ns convey the very essences of the truth of the characters feelings and situations.Throughout the novel, Nature seems to extract truth from characters and events. The text presents Nature as a force that attempts to expose the secret truth of many situations. Nature especially attempts to reveal the truth about Dimmesdales and Chillingworths dark inner souls. Dimmesdale carries a manifestation in [his] bodily frame(133) of his spiritual sickness. This outer illness is Natures attempt to reveal the guilty truth within Dimmesdale. Likewise, Chillingworth also bears the marks of Natures efforts to reveal his sin in his physical appearance. He has a low, dark and misshapen figure(133) whose ugly and evil(124) facial expressions grow more obvious to sight(124) every day. This outer branding serves as Natures attempt to expose Chillingworths inner demons. Triumphantly, Nature reveals Chillingworths wickedness to Hestor and Dimmesdale during the night of the great meteor. The mete oric light impart[s] a new expression(152) of understanding to Dimmesdale. He sees the malevolence with which(152) Chillingworth stares at him, and he develops an intense horror of the man(153) who is his physician.Natures efforts to reveal truth do not only focus on Chillingworths or Dimmesdales sins. The text suggests that Nature also attempts to expose the inner guilt of Hestor as completely as it exposes Chillingworths or Dimmesdales sins. On the day of Hestors release from prison, Nature seems to pour sunlight upon Hestor to reveal the scarlet letter on her breast(75). Although this incident may only have been the perverse trick of Hestors sick and morbid heart(75), it also seems that Nature is highlighting the scarlet letter to signify that the focus of this situation is the letter and not Hestor. Natures role in the scene seems to be to show that Hestors life from this moment forward will revolve around the A on her breast. For most of the town, she exists only as the b earer of the symbol, the embodiment of shame, and not as a whole and complex person.Also seemingly in pursuit of revealing truth, Nature gives Hestor a child, Pearl, who is like a scarlet blossom that reveals the truth of her mothers infidelity to the world. Pearl herself suggests that she had been plucked by her mother off the bush of wild roses that grew by the prison door(108). The text reinforces the idea that Pearl is like a lovely and immortal flower(85) that blossoms out of the rank luxuriance of her mothers guilty passion(85). Pearl then remains as a gift and a curse from Nature to forever remind Hestor and the citizens of Salem of the truth of her sin. True to the metaphor of the wild rose, Pearl appears to be a daughter of Nature. She embodies the wild, heathen Nature of the forest, never subjugated by human law(199). She is as wild as the sea breeze(174) and is gifted with a soul of the sea-fire(240). Her kinship with Nature manifests itself not only in metaphors d escribing her wild personality, but also in her desire for and uncanny sense of the truth. Nature and Pearl together prevent Hestor from removing the scarlet symbol of truth from her chest. Pearl seems to know that Hestor cannot abandon entirely the society and the morals that the scarlet letter represents. She points towards her mothers breast(205) while assuming a singular air of authority(205), insisting that her mother return the letter to its rightful place. Nature reflects Pearls angry frown(205), her pointed finger, and imperious gesture(205) in a little brook, giving emphasis(205) to Pearls demand. When Pearls distress escalates into piercing shrieks(206), the woods echo her cries. Because the forest reverberates Pearls screams, it seems as if a hidden multitude were lending her their sympathy and encouragement(206). The cooperation between Pearl and Nature causes Hestor to re-fasten the letter to her chest, symbolically continuing to declare the truth of her sin to t he world.In fact, Pearl always seems to sense the truth of a situation, or to aid in exposing the truth. She constantly pesters Hestor about the meaning of the scarlet letter. As a young child she gathers handfuls of wild-flowers and fling[s] them, one by one, at her mothers bosom(94), celebrating whenever she hits the scarlet letter. She seems to know that the scarlet letter, and consequently truth, are the keys to everything. Eventually, she comprehends that the letter denotes something sinful, something relating to the Black Man. She mentions Dimmesdales hand over his heart(184) when she sees him in the forest with her mother and wants to know why he does not wear it outside his bosom(184) as Hestor does. Perhaps through her kinship to Nature, she uncannily understands that Dimmesdales infirmity is due to his sinful spirit. She also quickly grasps that Dimmesdales sin somehow ties to her mothers sin, and that declaring a sin in the way her mother does is best. Also in her pursuit of truth, she fervently desires Dimmesdale to stand with her and Hestor in the sunlight, unknowingly requesting that her father reveal the truth about the bond between them all.Her quest for truth eventually leads her to pledge that she [will] grow up amid human joy and sorrow(251), ceasing to forever do battle with the world(251), and instead be a woman in it(251). The novel culminates its message of duality by showing the lawless child of nature embrace, in part, the morality of society. In order to live truth, Pearl must hold on to her wild roots, while accepting a civilized future. She must free herself from the isolation of New England, but not give herself over to the complete lawlessness of the forest. She seems on the verge of living the message of the novel by accepting the duality of her nature.

Imperialism Within the Heart of Darkness - 1143 Words

Imperialism within the Heart of Darkness A phenomenon, The Heart of Darkness, is a classic novel by Joseph Conrad, who reward individuals with their dark nature. The darkness that the characters face within themselves is the anchor towards the main theme of imperialism. Native Africans, around the early 1900s, were victims of imperialism in the novel. The Europeans saw themselves as prodigies and felt everyone redundant wanted to be like them for they perceived themselves as extraordinary. The Europeans thought so highly of themselves that they wanted to civilize what they perceived the Native Africans to be—savages. Ironically, the process of civilization became imperialism, and the Europeans were the definition of savage while the†¦show more content†¦This quote states that humans are fascinated with their abomination because they have not yet experienced it; but once they have, they feel powerless and yearn to escape, but the abomination overtakes them. This certai n curiosity of evil and darkness is what reigns over Europe. They are so curious of their own darkness that they themselves get lost within it and become the culprits of imperialism. Thus, through the moods and tones Conrad implants at the very beginning of his novel, he brings forth the coming of events which evolve into the realization of imperialism. Conrad uses symbolism in The Heart of Darkness to heighten the approach towards imperialism. For example, the reader’s encounter with the Accountant of the ivory trading Company in the outer region of Africa. Marlow describes him as an elegant dresser: â€Å"†¦I met a white man, in such an unexpected elegance of get-up that in the first moment I took him for a sort of vision† (16). Here, Marlow enters the beginning of his journey to the heart of Africa, and seeing the Accountant dress beautifully makes him seem like some kind of â€Å"miracle† (16) since their setting at the particular moment is in contrast. The Accountant symbolizes the Company and its excellence, professionalism, and perfection. Despite the blazing heat and his surroundings of poverty, he always dresses well. This is the professionalism ofShow MoreRelatedThe Heart Of Darkness By Joseph Conrad1293 Words   |  6 Pagesdifferently as an adolescent. In the Heart of Darkness, Joseph Conrad ex poses the psychological change that Marlow goes through by coming to Congo for the development of his experience and self through his confrontation with Kurtz, encounter with European imperialism, as well as his newfound awareness of the unknown and unfamiliar.Marlow’s confrontation with Kurtz was the beginning of his psychological development and awareness of himself in Heart of Darkness. The book starts off with Marlow desiringRead More Glorified Colonialism and Imperialism in Heart of Darkness Essay1202 Words   |  5 PagesImperialism Glorified in Heart of Darkness      Ã‚   Conrads Heart of Darkness is, as Edward Said states a story about European acts of imperial mastery (1503)-its methods, and the effects it has on human nature. Furthermore I hold the presumption that Conrad incorporates much of his own experience in the Congo and his opinions about imperialism. Another recent critic also suggests: he seems to approve of Marlow, the narrator (Achebe 1492). These revelations of the author are conveyed toRead MoreThe Journey In â€Å"Heart Of Darkness† Spans Not Only The Capricious1222 Words   |  5 PagesThe journey in â€Å"Heart of Darkness† spans not only the capricious waters extending our physical world, but also the perplexing ocean which exists in the heart of man. Through Marlow s somewhat overenthusiastic eyes, we perceive the mystery that is humanity, and the blurred line between darkness and light. It is an expedition into the deepest crevices of the human heart and mind bringing on an awareness, and finally descendi ng into the abyss of hell abiding in each of us. Conrad’s use of wordplayRead More Colonialism and Imperialism in Conrads Heart of Darkness Essay1016 Words   |  5 PagesImperialism Exposed in Conrads Heart of Darkness      Ã‚   Joseph Conrads Heart of Darkness is a novel about European imperialism and its far-reaching effects. Conrad relates his personal opinions through the protagonist, Marlow, who learns a great deal about imperialism while on a journey to the African Congo. Although Heart of Darkness seems to be an anti-imperialistic work, this is not entirely true. Conrad condemns the overly idealistic nature of imperialism, but does not attack BritainsRead MoreConrad s Heart Of Darkness1138 Words   |  5 PagesThe modernity of Heart of Darkness is exposed/reflected through the growing belief/awareness of new anthropological and psychological theories with unprecedented insights into the human condition. Conrad shocks readers out of their complacency as he addresses his fascination with dark psychology through modernist inclinations of the rendering of consciousness, the narrator s stream of consciousness and ambiguity. Heart of Darkness as a Modernist novel draws upon/gives prominence to the developmentRead More Colonialism and Imperialism in Heart of Darkness and A Passage to India1683 Words   |  7 Pages It is best to analyze the works, Heart of Darkness and A Passage to India, applying the historical and cultural conditions of the society in which they were produced. The relations between groups and classes of people that imperialism sets up, and that these two works explore, starkly reveals the contradictions within capitalism in a way that a similar piece of fiction set within one culture and dealing with characters from that culture alone cannot. Prior to the analysis however, I would likeRead MoreEssay on Imperialism- Conrads Heart of Darkness1162 Words   |  5 PagesImperialism and its oppressive processes have affected societies as well as individual lives for centuries. In Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness, oppression through imperialism demonstrates how a certain civilization, the Congolese, is affected negatively by imperialism. By focusing on Africa, it allows for a graphic recount of the many years spent reigned by foreign oppressors and tyrannies. In Heart of Da rkness, the Congo is oppressed by the imperialists economically and geographically. As wellRead MoreShakespeare s Heart Of Darkness1424 Words   |  6 Pages Relevance of Heart of Darkness Alexander Spirovski LITR 211 Professor David Auchter â€Æ' Joseph Conrad s Heart of Darkness contains both relevant and irrelevant elements to today s society. Issues present in the text such as imperialism, racism, and moral ambiguity are still present today but their formats have changed enough in society that Heart of Darkness approaches obsolescence in perspective. Concurrently, the characters and theme presented in Heart of Darkness are scarce in fictionalRead MoreHeart Of Darkness, By Joseph Conrad1306 Words   |  6 PagesWhat is the â€Å"horror† in Heart of Darkness, and what particular literary images develop that idea of horror in the novel? In Joseph Conrad’s, Heart of Darkness, there can be many literary images found within that develop the idea of horror. Heart of Darkness is noted for its horror within the Congo between the Africans and the Europeans. The horror in Heart of Darkness is a contribution of many ideas that are formed and contributed from the European colonists. The purpose of this essay aims to argueRead MoreExamining Themes in Heart of Darkness Essay844 Words   |  4 Pages Joseph Conrad wrote the book, Heart of Darkness, in 1898. He wrote this book touching on many different themes such as imperialism and commerce, darkness imagery, dream and nightmare, isolation, mental and physical illness, truth, and journey. Although all the themes are important to make Heart of Darkness complete, three prevail overall: imperialism and commerce, truth, and journey. Being the author of the book, Joseph Conrad had a personal connection to it. He took his own journey down the Congo

Conditions of the Poor in the 19th Century Portrayed in A...

In A Christmas carol, how does Dickens make the reader aware of the conditions of the poor in the 19th century? In what ways does he make his message palatable? The story of ‘A Christmas Carol’ is set in Charles Dickens home town of London. In the Victorian period Londoners were split in two categories, the rich and poor and the streets were filled with diseases and many poor children died at young ages. There were many big families who had small but affordable meals throughout the year, but for one day in the year they attempted to earn as much money as they could so families could have a special meal. This day was Christmas and in my essay I am going to be describing how Dickens get across the Christmas spirit people have.†¦show more content†¦But Bob Cratchit who worked for Scrooge as a clerk was treated even worse then most poor workers who were never treated with dignity. He was paid below the average pay for a regular poor worker, so struggled to pay for food and his family bills. He had to work in terrible conditions, for example Scrooge looked after the coal box and wouldn’t give Cratchit fclerk put on his white comforter, and tried to warm himself at the candle; in which efforts, not being a man of strong imagination, he failed.’ Bob Cratchit really loved Christmas and when he applauded Scrooge’s nephew talking to Scrooge about how great Christmas was, Scrooge said, ‘Let me hear another sound from you and you’ll keep your Christmas by losing your situation.’ Scrooge had threatened to sack Bob Cratchit so close to Christmas and just shows how mean he was and how poorly workers were treated in Victorian times. In Dickens time workers were paid poor money but they had to rely on this income so much because if a poor person didn’t have this small amount of money they would surely have to live on the stre ets begging for food and would find it difficult to get another job which is why Bob Cratchit can’t argue with Scrooge’s dismal treatment of him and he just has to cope with it. Cratchit had to work everyday in the year, except Christmas which was the one day the Cratchit family would have a proper meal with a goose and lots more treats they wouldn’tShow MoreRelated 19th Century London in A Christmas Carol by Charles Dickens Essay2454 Words   |  10 Pages19th Century London in A Christmas Carol by Charles Dickens A time for finding yourself a year older, and not an hour richer this is a good example that represents Scrooges overall attitude to Christmas and those who celebrate it. The central character of a Christmas Carol is Ebenezer Scrooge a man portrayed by Dickens as a miser who cares little for others around him, a man whose only interest in life is money that can be made from exploiting other people. The novel is set in VictorianRead MoreHow Does The Author Use Language From Present Scrooge s Unpleasant Personality?1376 Words   |  6 Pagesprison. Today s audience will see Scrooge this way and agree that he is a misery, bitter old man, who doesn t like giving away however back in the 19th century the audience would not be shocked to see a wealthy man as selfish as Scrooge. It was common in London at the time to see factory workers exploiting children who worked in hard conditions by hurting them with the most dangerous work and the cruelest words which is why I can only but say that Scrooge is an unpleasant, old wretch. FurtherRead MoreVictorian Novel9605 Words   |  39 PagesTEXTS 3 IV TOPICS 3 INTRODUCTION Many associate the word â€Å"Victorian† with images of over-dressed ladies and snooty gentlemen gathered in reading rooms. The idea of â€Å"manners† does sum up the social climate of middle-class England in the nineteenth century. However, if there is one transcending aspect to Victorian England life and society, that aspect is change. Nearly every institution of society was affected by rapid and unforeseeable changes.  As some writers greeted them with fear and others embracedRead MoreProject Mgmt296381 Words   |  1186 Pageswave This page intentionally left blank Project Management The Managerial Process The McGraw-Hill/Irwin Series Operations and Decision Sciences OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT Beckman and Rosenfield, Operations, Strategy: Competing in the 21st Century, First Edition Benton, Purchasing and Supply Chain Management, Second Edition Bowersox, Closs, and Cooper, Supply Chain Logistics Management, Third Edition Brown and Hyer, Managing Projects: A Team-Based Approach, First Edition Burt, Petcavage, and

My Greatest Fail free essay sample

I don’t remember how I got this ball. In fact, it was in my hands and I had no idea what to do with it. I hesitated a little bit and saw how the members of another team were all running at me. At this moment I was overwhelmed by fear and in order not to be attacked by them, I just gave my rivals what they wanted. I was just playing a basketball with my class in Physical Education and when the game was over, my team was watching me with piercing, wicked glance. I knew that they would express their discontent about what I’d done and they were totally right because it was my fault. I wanted to be out of their sight at that moment, so I quickly went to the changing room. At the same time, another team was passing by, smiling and saying â€Å"Thanks† to me. We will write a custom essay sample on My Greatest Fail or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page When I came out of the room, my team was already standing by the door, waiting for me. I knew that they wouldn’t beat me, but I was shaking like a rabbit, surrounded by snakes. As I thought, they started blaming me for their loss. I said that they shouldn’t be so upset because we were playing only at Physical Education and they wouldn’t get any prize for their victory, but they didn’t want to listen. In a few minutes, when this accusation was over, they left me where I was standing. The next lesson of P.E., teacher allocated the class in two teams like the last time. The captain of my team almost begged the teacher to exchange me with another student, but she refused and said that they should give me one more chance. The captain came up to me and said not to touch the ball and not to do anything but running backwards and forwards, pretending that I am in game. I nodded with guiltiness. When the game began, nobody tossed me the ball. Everybody was playing among each other, ignoring me and at first, I liked such position. My team was losing again and, this time it wasn’t my fault. I was watching it with some sadness and burning with desire to help them. I thought that I had to atone for my guilt and do my best to help them win. I made a deep breath in and ran to the person who had the ball. He was so shocked because he didn’t expect me to act like this and when he hesitated, I quickly took away the ball from him. Then the battle began. Everybody started attacking me while my team was watching me in disbelief. It was really hard not to let this ball be caught, but I was forcing my way to the basket, thinking about victory. When I was standing near it I threw the ball to the basket without hesitation. It was the most exciting moment in my life. The ball was making the circles at the top of the basket and we all were waiting it to fall. In a few seconds it did. I screamed without the belief that the miracle had just happened and I heard that somebody screamed behind my back too. When I turned around, I saw that it wasn’t my team laughing. They stood with their eyes on the floor, shaking their heads while another team was applauding me. I asked what was going on and the captain of my team, lookin g at me angrily, said:† Congratulations! You made a goal into your own basket.† I went to home with some disappointment. But later, I understood the impact of this experience on me. Thanks to it, I learned not to give up despite the difficulties that I face. Even if I fail at something, that also will be a good lesson for me. So, I will always try new things, whether I am good or bad at it.

What sort of society and values does Oscar Wilde present in Importance of being Earnest Essay Example

What sort of society and values does Oscar Wilde present in Importance of being Earnest Paper In the days when the play was set, people were spilt into three different classes. There were the Upper class people, who lived in an aristocrat society, who mainly invested from lands. Then, there were the tradesmen, who had new wealth which they made from their businesses. Finally, you would have the lower class people, who were the servants of the upper classes. The characters in the play are leading a comfortable life. They live in a sophisticated life style, where everything for them is a breeze, they have servants to do all the work for them, while they sit and relax. They lead a superior life style, everyone under them has to look up to them. The lower classes are expected to respect them. In act 1, when Lady Bracknell visits Algernon, he had eaten all the cucumber sandwiches, which were especially made for her. As a good and loyal servant should do, Lane lies to get his master out of trouble, which is what all good servants should do. Algernon quotes, if the lower orders dont set us a good example, what on earth is the use of them? This shows what they thought of the lower classes as being their guide to life. We will write a custom essay sample on What sort of society and values does Oscar Wilde present in Importance of being Earnest specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on What sort of society and values does Oscar Wilde present in Importance of being Earnest specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on What sort of society and values does Oscar Wilde present in Importance of being Earnest specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer Lady Bracknell quotes, Nor do I approve in anyway of the modern sympathy with invalids when speaking to Algernon about Mr Bunbury. She says this with coldness and in an uncaring way. The aristocrat society lives on an unearned income. They, do not have to work for their living, they neednt a job. That is why land and inheritance are important in their life. They invest in land mainly and thats where their money comes from. With no businesses to worry about, they can enjoy the comfort of gong to dinner parties, arranging them, go to the opera and watch plays. They can sometimes to go into debt, like Algernon for example, who owes much money, pays no bills etc. We know this as he quotes, Half of the chaps who get into the bankruptcy Court are called Algernon, This obviously means that he goes there often, if he know everyones names there who go themselves. He lives beyond his means, he just spends, spends, and spends. Lady Bracknell quotes, He has nothing, but he looks everything when trying to persuade Jack to allow Algernon to marry Cecily. They live in an extravagant lifestyle with many luxuries. Algernons flat is said to be artistically furnished. The rich of that era have calling cards, when someone visits, to inform the owners of the house. A servant carries these to them on a salver, a silver plate. They drink good wine and make sure it does not go to waste. They eat their bread with no crust. They usually own a country estate with acres of land, which are usually let out. Then, they should have a town house, somewhere to stay during the season. The season is when everyone comes to London to attend all the parties, galas, balls, etc. to exchange gossip. Young unmarried girls come with their parents to find an eligible bachelor. Rich girls usually married for a title or name. Men with a title or name, but no money, would marry a rich girl, to gain some money. The book is based in a aristocratic society, where they have many values, which are most importantly; Money, appearance, sincerity, social snobbery and superficial values. Oscar Wilde has put in a whole range of these in his play. Money is everything to the aristocrat society. Without it, they would be pushed down the society ladder. They do not work for their money, but instead they invest it from land and properties. If you had money, you could do anything you want. In Act 1, when Lady Bracknell asks for the cucumber sandwiches, Algernon replies, I am greatly distressed, Aunt Augusta, about there being no cucumbers, not even for ready money, This shows that he just gets his food without paying, they just put it on a tab with him. He probably owes many people money, but who is to argue with the rich? Anyone would do anything for money. When Cecily sneaked out of the house to go and visit Jack in his country house, she probably asked her maid to keep quiet about her whereabouts. Though, by the means of a small coin, Lady Bracknell managed to gain the information of her daughters whereabouts. Lady Bracknell is the one in the play who most considers money to be the main importance in life. It would seem obvious that she even married for money herself, as she says, When I married Lord Bracknell I had no fortune of any kind. But I never dreamed for a moment of allowing that to stand in my way. When questioning Jack, to see if he is fit to be even considered to marry her dear Gwendolen, the most important question is What is your income? Jack replies to this saying Between seven and eight thousand a year,, which in those days, would make him a millionaire. This is the only note she makes of him in her notebook. She is perfectly satisfied that Jack makes his money from investments and not so much from land as she says,, Land has ceased to be either a profit or a pleasure, Lady Bracknell questions Cecily to see if she is acceptable to marry her nephew, Algernon. She first says that she is running out of time, halfway through the interview and she must hurry. Then, as a last question, she asks if Cecily has any fortune. She expects Jack to answer that by saying, No, she has little, she lives here as my ward and I provide for her, To her surprise, Jack tells her that Cecily has about  £30,00 in the funds. He then says, Thats all. Good-bye Lady Bracknell, So pleased to have seen you, knowing her attitude would change now to the mention of that large sum of money. Lady Bracknell decides to stay, after discovering that this girl is an extremely wealthy girl and her money is in the funds as well. She now says, Miss Cardew seems to me a most attractive young lady now that I look at her, Lady Bracknell now finds her a respectable candidate for Algernon, as she has all this money. Her plan backfires though, as Jack refuses their engagement. Lady Bracknell tells Jack, that she will overlook Algernons conduct to him, but this is not true, she hasnt carefully considered her decision, but she wants to try and persuade Jack to accept the engagement so Algernon can grab his hands on Cecilys money. Jack tells Lady Bracknell that Cecily does not come legally of age until she is 35. Lady Bracknell has no objection to this though, as she realises that if she leaves the marriage for a few more years, Cecily s money will grow even more. Gwendolen makes it quite clear, that she is wealthy, by pointing out that she buys the more expensive monthly magazines, when talking to Jack. She doesnt but the expensive magazines, but the more expensive ones. Which shows, shes probably no different to Lady Bracknell, as Algernon says, All women become like their mothers. In every interview, she always starts with a few simple questions e. g. how old are you? Then, in the middle of her questions, she adds the most eagerly waited of question, how much money do you have. Appearance is also important to the characters in the play. The whole of the play is based on the one name of Ernest, which for some reason Gwendolen and Cecily adore and is their dream to marry someone with that name. Gwendolen says, There is something in that name that inspires absolute confidence She says that she was destined to love him as soon as she heard the name mentioned. She says that the name, Produces vibrations This shows us that the first thing Gwendolen looks for in a man is his name. Your Christian name has an irresistible fascination, quotes Gwendolen. The name Jack sounds such a plain name, when you think of Jack, you think of someone who lives in the country, who is quite plain and simple. The name Ernest though, sounds more aristocrat and when saying it, Ernest sounds more interesting than Jack does. She looks for a husband who will listen and do everything she commands, just how Lady Bracknell treats her husband. I know this, from the line Gwendolen says at the end of her engagement discussion with Jack. She says, I hope you will always look at me just like that, especially when there are other people present referring to Jacks blue eyes, like a puppy-dog face. She wants him to be like a dog on a leash that she can take with her anywhere and have him well trained. Cecily, a more plain girl, it would seem, but she is also picky with names. She and Gwendolen both say that they, pity any poor married woman whose husband is not called Ernest. Algernon thinks his name is rather an aristocratic name, but Cecily would only give all her love to someone with the name of Ernest. She here is being a little judgmental towards the name of a person. Its like how Gwendolen first met Cecily, Cecily told her, her name and Gwendolen in turn replies, What a very sweet name! Something tells me that we are going to be great friends, Which is a bit ironic, as later on in their meeting, they despise each other. Lady Bracknell considers the odd number side of the street as unfashionable. She tells us this when she is questioning Jack. This shows us that the respected ones in society live in an even numbered house. When Jack tells her about him, that he was discovered in a handbag at Victoria Station, she immediately is disgusted. She almost certainly now will not allow her daughter to marry someone who was found in a handbag, or as she puts it, to marry into a cloakroom and form an alliance with a parcel. She says that Algernon has no money, but he looks the part, though this is a bit false, as Lady Bracknell is always thinking of money when it comes down to these circumstances. Though it doesnt really matter, because if Algernon and Cecily do get married, then Algernon will share her money. She also finds long engagements not acceptable as, They give people the opportunity of finding out each others character before marriage, She has this idea of making someone look something that theyre really not. As long as you look good, thats what important. She examines Cecilys profile, when inquiring about her. Her first impressions of Cecily, were that she dressed too simply and hair was not done up in any extravagant way, but was left as nature might have left it. She tells Cecily to put her chin a little higher, Style largely depends on the way of the chin is worn, as she states. The characters in the book have many false and superficial values. Girls of the aristocrat society, did not have a choice of who they wanted to marry, it was up to their parents to decide for them. We discover in the first act, that Lady Bracknell has a list of eligible young men, the same list as the Duchess of Bolton in fact. She carries a notebook and pencil in her pocket, as though shes always on the look out for new candidates to add to her list. Algernon thinks that Bunburying should be known to every mans life. He believes that if a man doesnt know about it when he gets married, then hell have a very tedious married life. He believes that, in married life three is company and two is none. Bunbury, as Algernon calls it, is way of making up an imaginary friend/relative and using them as an excuse to get out of town into the country or the other way round. Both Algernon and Jack have invented a imaginary friend/relative to get them out of town and dinner parties. Its this bunburying that causes so much trouble and confusion among the characters. In the play, dinner and meals are mentioned quite a lot. Cecily says, When one is going to lead an entirely new life, one requires regular and wholesome meals, Algernons first conversation in the play with Jack, he asks Jack to dine with him and says, I hate people who are not serious about meals. Most of the lines that are to do with food, are Algernons lines. His character is a very greedy character, food wise that is. Algernon states that, it is customary in good society to take some slight refreshment at five oclock. Nearly every moment in the play he is always eating something, I guess that Wilde, perhaps did this deliberately to make the play more amusing. A dinner party is also a key aspect of their lives. Lady Bracknell is an expert in this and plans her seating plans very carefully. So there is the same amount of men as there is women, so they can all pair up. When Algernon says he cannot attend his Aunts dinner party, Lady Bracknell in turn replies to this, It would put my table completely out, Her husband, instead would have to fill in Algernons place, which she is not too pleased about. This shows that her and her husbands relationship, doesnt seem to be a very strong one and she prefers not to mention Lord Bracknell. Dinner parties are the limelight of the season. Its where everyone went to catch up with news and find a husband/wife. The main characteristics of the character in the play, are their social snoberish, Which they show a lot of in the play. Algernon, when it comes to food and drink, hes quite selfish. He had cucumber sandwiches made especially for his Aunt, but he ends up eating them all. He is allowed them, but no one else is. He finds that not receiving invitations is annoying. Algernon takes his life too easy, he lives in debt and if something goes wrong, he has Lane or another lower class to blame. He thinks it is awfully hard work doing nothing, which is quite the opposite of what most people would think. As he has no job, nothing to occupy himself, it is quite easy to get bored and you realise you need the need of some sort of hobby, events to got to etc. Algernon states that, Relations are simply a tedious pack of people, who havent got the remotest knowledge of how to live This is a bit ironic, as at the end of the play, Algernon discovers that his best friend is in fact his elder brother. The characters find the French as disrespectful and are a bad influence on the English. The Germans, however are more respected. Lady Bracknell, always seem to boast about her social links with people of a high position. When Lady Bracknell finds out there are no cucumber sandwiches, she doesnt mind as she had some crumpets with Lady Harbury, a Lady, probably with a high social position. Lady Bracknell even shares the same list of eligible men as the Duchess of Bolton. There are also several other names of high social stature mentioned by Lady Bracknell in her conversations, Lady Lancing and Lady Dumbleton. Lady Bracknell quotes, That in families of high position strange coincidences are not suppose to occur, referring to the confusion of Jacks true identity. She is trying to say that only the common would find themselves in these inexplicable situations. People, according to Lady Bracknell, are only considered respected, if they are seen at social gatherings and dinner parties. They count as Tories. They dine with us. And Indeed I am told that one of the Mr Markbys is occasionally to be seen as dinner parties. So far I am satisfied. These are examples of this way of judging people by their attendance to social parties, that Lady Bracknell says in the play. People who went to Oxford were said to be truthful people, but this is a lie as Algernon went to Oxford and has told many lies in the play. Algernon says, Literacy criticism should be left to those who didnt go to university, Therefore the ones who could not afford to attend universities, but earn a living from writing critical comments in the newspapers. The uproar between Cecily and Gwendolen, is quite amusing, as they both have to try and control their surge of anger, for the sake of their reputation. They dont want Merriman to see them having a bickering, which could break out into violence, that is not what an upper class lady would do, its something that you would see the lower class do. Gwendolen throws such snoberish comments at Cecily. Sugar is not fashionable anymore, and Cake is rarely seen at the best houses nowadays, which really puts Cecily down. Gwendolen tells Cecily that she hates crowds, which is ironic, as Cecily replies to this, I suppose thats why you live in town? and Gwendolen is furious.

Douglass Response essays

Douglass Response essays The Douglass document was written by an escaped slave named Frederick Douglass. Douglass has written three autobiographies. He was asked to deliver a 4th of July oration. He presented this on July 5, 1852 at a meeting sponsored by the Rochester Ladies Anti-Slavery Society at Rochester Hall in Rochester, N.Y. In his document Douglass proposes the question what to the slave is the Fourth of July. In his document he does a good job of getting everyones attention by honoring the fathers of the republic. He calls them great men great enough to give fame to a great age. He said that he will unite with you to honor their memory but that the point that he is compelled to view them is not, certainly, the most favorable and yet he cannot contemplate their great deeds with less than admiration. Douglass quickly argues what it means to be human. He says that the slaveholders themselves acknowledge it...They acknowledge it when they punish disobedience on the part of the slave. There are seventy-two crimes in the State of Virginia, which, if committed by a black man subject him to the punishment of death; while only two of the same crimes will subject a white man to the like punishment. If a black man is then a man it should be enough to affirm the equal manhood of the negro race and give them all the rights that are defined in the Rights of Man, 1789, and the Declaration of Independence, 1776. Douglass uses this speech as a chance to remind the north that America isnt truly free yet because even though they have declared their independence and abolished slavery in the north that until the south abolished slavery it wouldnt be free. He makes the point that yes it is good that slavery is abolished in the north but it really doesnt mean that much because slavery wasnt a great factor in the north becau...

A) The definition of purchasing and supply management and the Essay

A) The definition of purchasing and supply management and the importance to the business world - Essay Example All the activities carried out under purchasing and supply management, call for cost-effectiveness. Individuals assigned the tasks of purchasing and supply management have to apply tactics and strategies when selecting suppliers and negotiating prices. This paper provides a discussion of purchasing and supply management. The discussion includes the importance of purchasing and supply to the business world, steps in creating project supply, service, and material budget, selecting suppliers, strategies for negotiating prices and costs of outsourcing. The paper concludes by evaluating organizations that are benchmark in purchasing and supply management. Purchasing entails acquiring goods and services necessary for the organization’s day to day operation or manufacturing of products. Supply management, also referred to as supply chain management is the process employed by organizations with the objective of having a cost-effective and efficient supply chain. In commerce, through purchasing, industries and public corporations procure raw materials, supplies and services. The important processes included in purchasing are identifying the needs, selecting the supplier, negotiating appropriate price, reviewing the terms and conditions, issuing the order or contract, and finally, follow up on the delivery. Basically, purchasing is centered on the task of ensuring that materials or products, which are of right quantity, quality and price are obtained from the selected supplier at the right time and place. Purchasing is done either for resale by retailers and wholesalers or for transformation that is industrial purchasing (Benton, 2 006). A supply chain in most cases comprises five important stages, which are plan, develop, make, deliver and lastly return. In supply chain management, the first stage, known as a plan is to determine how goods and services will satisfy customers’ requirements and needs. Develop, as the

Writing Project Three Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Writing Project Three - Essay Example Consequently, the country has been forced to introduce mechanisms for sorting out trash into different categories, such that most of the trash is recycled, and only a small percentage of it is disposed, mostly through incineration (Onishi, n.p). Thus, in â€Å"Japan, up to 80 percent of garbage is incinerated, while a similar percentage ends up in landfills in the United States† (Onishi, n.p). At this point, it becomes important ponder over the question: if Japan has fallen short of land such that it exports its trash for disposal in the United States landfills, what is likely to happen in the future, if the trash being produced globally is not minimized? The global population continues to grow by the day, and the world has recently hit the seven billion mark. However, the world is not expanding as the population expands, and thus essential resources, most especially land, continues to become scarce as more population is added to the global statistics (USDA.gov, n.p.). Consequently, if the scarcity of land globally is to be mitigated effectively, then there must be a drastic reduction in the trash produced, which will in turn reduce the need for dumpsites. This will effectively create more usable land for accommodating the growing population. Thus, more than ever before, there is a great need for the world to take the path that has been charted by Japan, and start reducing the amount of trash that is produced. However, while this is a noble course, it will have little impact, if the society is not fully educated and implored into buying the ideas of trash reduction (NEEF, n.p.). Thus, education becomes a very important tool through which the objective for reducing the trash produced globally can be achieved. Tomorrow’s leaders must be equipped with the necessary skills, knowledge and capabilities for tomorrow’s challenges, which therefore

French Revolution Essay Example for Free

French Revolution Essay I hold it, that a little rebellion, now and then, is a good thing, and as necessary in the political world as storms in the physical. Thomas JeffersonPolitical rebellion takes place when the people of a country feel it is essential that a change in government is made. Different nations have different ideas about the responsibilities of government, and as a result there are many possible reasons for political rebellion. John Locke, an English medical doctor and philosopher who lived until 1704, published his liberal theories about government, property, and the rights of man, in his book Second Treatise of Government. Edmund Burke, a writer with a legal background who spent his life involved in English politics, published his opinions about revolution in 1790 in his book Reflections on the Revolution in France. Both Locke and Burke support political rebellion, but Lockes belief that politics are based upon abstract natural rights drives his support for the complete dissolution of government in the event of rebellion, while Burkes belief that rights and morals are derived from the conventions of society makes his support for rebellion more reserved and conditional. This comparison is significant to any individuals considering revolution as a means of changing government. The outcomes of rebellion can depend on the underlying beliefs driving it, and both writers positions are useful to establish the underlying reasons for revolution, and some of the risks involved depending on the extent of the change. Locke believes that before we form civil society by consenting to establish government, we live in a State of Nature. He describes this pre-political state as,a state of perfect freedom to order their actions, and dispose of their possessions and persons, as they think fit, within the bounds of the law of nature, without asking leave, or depending on the will of any other man. (Locke, 1980, p. 81)The State of Nature is ruled essentially by human nature. Liberty, equality, self preservation, reason, and property are the most prominent principles that Locke feels are innate to humans. Locke explains how nature intended for all men to be equal,creatures of the same species and rank, promiscuously born to all the same advantages of nature, and the use of the same facilities should be equal amongst another (Locke, 1980, p. 8)Locke comes to the conclusion that humans are self preserving in the State of Nature, through his observations that we are attracted to pleasure and have aversions to pain. He believes that God gives us these attractions and aversions that preserve us, because we are essentially all the property of God. This limits the perfect freedom present in the State of Nature. Since we belong to God, we do not have the liberty to destroy ourselves. Although we are not all born with property (except through inheritance which Locke fully supports) the ability to acquire property is present in the State of Nature, for it is attained by our labor and resources. Our self preserving instinct produces a great desire among us to protect property that we have attained, therefore measures taken to protect our property are considered just. Since government does not exist in this state, individuals have the right to uphold the law. Locke believes that any individual, who breaks the laws of nature, proves that he is not ruled by reason and equality, as the rest of the inhabitants in the state are. Breaking the law can be defined as doing harm to innocent others, this includes stealing property or acts of physical harm. These offenders are dangerous to mankind, and their peers must invoke punishment, every man hath a right to punish the offender, and be the executioner of the law of nature. (Locke, 1980, p. 10)Punishment in the State of Nature takes on two distinct forms: reparation and restraint. Only the victim of the crime committed is entitled to reparation, to compensate for the damage he has received. Restraint is the method used to ensure that the crime will not be committed again, usually by causing repent. Since there is no judge to decide to what extent offenders should be punished, it becomes a decision based on the instinct and reason of the individuals involved. Locke outlines some details about invoking punishment to make this individual license more clear, every man, in the State of Nature, has a power to kill a murderer, both to deter others from doing the like injury, which no reparation can compensate, and also to secure men from the attempts of a criminal, who having renounced reason, the common rule god hath given to mankind, hath, by the unjust violence and slaughter he hath committed upon one, declared war against all mankind (Locke, 1980, p. 11) While Locke gives complex details about this theoretical pre-political state, Edmund Burke does not believe it exists at all. Burke believes that we are born into civil society, and that the qualities Locke describes in the State of Nature, are not innate, but are derived from societal institutions. for I have in my contemplation the civil social man, and no other. (Burke, 1987, p. 522) Since our rights develop from experience, compromise, convention, and reason (which is learned) natural and abstract rights do not exist in a universal sense. Burke believes that such abstract ideas about natural rights are too simple to fit into the real world, and if something were true, it would have to possess the ability to be contextualized. in the gross and complicated mass of human passions and concerns, the primitive rights of men undergo such a variety of refractions and reflections that it becomes absurd to talk of them as if they continued in the simplicity of their original direction. The nature of man is intricate; the objects of society are of the greatest possible complexity; and therefore no simple disposition of direction of power can be suitable wither to mans nature or to the quality of his affairs. (Ayling, 1988, p. 210)Burke also fears that abstract rights, expressed by philosophers such as John Locke, place too much emphasis on individualism, restricting essential human affections. Burke believes that affections preserve society; for it is the respect, love, and admiration of the past, those around us, and those who are not yet born that solidifies traditions and institutions. On the scheme of this barbarous philosophy laws are to be supported only by their own terrors and by the concern which each individual may find in them from his private speculations or can spare to them from his own interests our institutions can never be embodied, if I may use the expression in persons, so as to create in us love, veneration, admiration, or attachment. But that sort of reason which banishes the affections is incapable of taking their place. (Burke, 1987, p.68) Burke does believe that we posses liberties, but that they are flexible and particular to each society. These liberties are exercised through societal institutions, so if the institutions are erased then so are our liberties. In the following quote, Burke explains his conception of the rights of man, by listing rights that are specifically satisfied by institutions such as law courts, hospitals, and educational facilities. Men have a right to do justice they have a right to the fruits of their industry, and to the means of making their industry fruitful. They have a right to the acquisitions of their parents; to the nourishment and improvement of their offspring; to instruction in life, and consolation in death. (Burke, 1987, p. 51)Burke and Locke agree that humans have a need for government. Locke explains chaotic anarchy as the dark time in the State of Nature, the tragedy of the commons. This situation occurs after currency has been created in the State of Nature, leaving individuals free to accumulate money. The demise of the golden age (the era of harmony) is brought about by property disputes, greed, and insecurity. When the inhabitants of the State of Nature realize that they will not be able to cure the inconveniences of the state (the insecurity of property and inability to settle disputes due to lack of impartial judges) they realize the need for government and learn a system of political rationality. Burke uses the example of the French revolution to illustrate the need for organized government. He believes that the state is an organic body; it can be adjusted but if it is destroyed total chaos is likely to result. Although the French attempted to set up new governments such as the National Assembly and later the National Convention, they were short lived and unstable. The French revolution brought about periods of anarchy, a state of a suspended constitution, overturned laws, destabilized economy, and the closing of essential institutions. The violent era known as the Reign of Terror is certainly comparable to Lockes tragedy of the commons. When Napoleons Coup detat took place in 1799, the French people were desperate for an organized government to bring an end to the terror and re-build their society. Locke stresses the importance of the social contract that occurs during the transition from the tragedy of the commons to civil society. Political power is manifested peacefully by a voluntary agreement between the people and the sovereign or ruling body. Burke does not acknowledge this specific moment of consent that Locke professes, but Burke values a consent of a more tacit nature. Burke attributes given consent far back in history, At some time or another all the beginners of dynasties were chosen by those who called them to govern. (Burke, 1987, p. 13) and he implies that consent to the government is inherited though generations. we transmit our government and our privileges in what we improve we are never wholly new; in what we retain we are never wholly obsolete adhering in this manner and on those principles of our forefathers In this choice of inheritance we have given to our frame of polity the image of a relation in blood, binding up the constitution of our country with the dearest domestic ties, adopting our fundamental laws in to the bosom of our family affections, keeping inseparable and cherishing with the warmth of all their combined and mutually reflected charities our state, our hearths, our sepulchres, and our alters. (Burke, 1987, p. 30)Burke might say that by being born under any government, we are naturally subjects to it since we inherit the choices of our forefathers. Locke disagrees with this, taking into account that children can not be completely free, yet he still insists that there is a specific time in each persons life where they must give consent to the government in order to become part of the body politic. a child is born a subject of no country or government. He is under his fathers tuition and authority, till he comes to the age of discretion; and then he is a free man, at liberty what government will he put himself under, what body politic he will unite himself to (Locke, 1980, p. 63)Property is sacred to both writers. Locke and Burke agree that the main function of government is for the protection of our property. The government is also responsible for protection from external attack and from each other. Locke speaks of why men give up some of their natural liberties, such as punishing offenders, to the government, for the mutual preservation of their lives, liberties, and estates, which I call by the general name property. (Locke, 1980, p. 66) Burke also defends property as an important liberty, it is the property of the citizen, and not to the demands of the creditor of the state, that first and original faith of civil society is pledged. (Burke, 1987, p. 94) Locke believes that government, the protector of our property, has no right to confiscate it, The supreme power cannot take from any man any part of his property without his own consent: for the preservation of property being the end of government (Locke, 1980, p. 73) And Burke agrees with him by expressing his distaste for the massive amounts of church property that were confiscated by the National Assembly in the French Revolution. we do not approve your confiscation of the revenues of bishops, and deans It is in the principle of injustice that the danger lies (Burke, 1987, p. 133) He explains how the governments violation of property rights can lead to failure of government by angering the people. if governments provide for debts by heavy impositions, they perish by becoming odious to the people. (Burke, 1987, p.136) Tyranny is condemned by both Locke and Burke. Both support a system with a division of power in the he government. When a government has power divided into different bodies it is forced to be held responsible for decisions made to the other branches of government, and to the body politic. This system of checks and balances makes arbitrary rule unlikely to occur. Citizens feel more secure and protected form the government, and since they are given a chance to assert their concerns (for example, Englands House of Commons) drastic action like revolution becomes unnecessary. Revolution to Locke means the dissolution of the government in power. The citizens then return to the State of Nature until they choose to give consent to create a new government. He supports revolution in two possible instances he describes the first, governments are dissolved, when the legislative, or the prince, either of them, act contrary to their trust. (Locke, 1980, p. 111) Locke gives examples of the government breaking the trust of the body politic as tyranny, usurpation, or the violation of the social contract that was established between the people and the government when civil society was formed. This social contract enabled the government to have power, and the people agreed to obey the laws in return for government protection of property and rights. The second instance in which rebellion is likely to occur is,When so ever the legislative put into the hands of any other, an absolute power over the lives, liberties, and estates of the people; by this breach of trust they forfeit the power the people had put into their hands and it devolves to the people, who have a right to resume their original liberty (Locke, 1980, p.111) Since the social contract that created the government commits the people only to the government they have chosen to lift them from the tragedy of the commons, the government does not posses the right to forfeit the body politic to another power by conquest. It is the responsibility of the government that was peacefully formed to protect the people from the conquest of arbitrary outside powers. To Edmund Burke, revolution is the last resort to be used as a solution to a problem with the ruling body. The line of demarcation where obedience ought to end and resistance must begin is faint, obscure, and not easily definable. It is not a single act, or a single event, which determines it. Governments must be abused and deranged, indeed, before it can be thought of; and the prospect of the future must be as bad as the experience of the past. (Burke, 1987, p. 27)His opinions differ from Lockes regarding the way that effective revolution should initiate change. Burke agrees that the government should be responsible for protecting its citizens, however in the event that the government breaks this trust we do not return to our natural liberty, as Locke believes. Burke finds this return to natural liberty impossible, not only because of his disbelief in the existence of the State of Nature, but also because Burke flatly denies the peoples right to form government for them. He believes that we inherit liberties and government from our previous generations, and government contains more wisdom, captured through the state institutions, than one human is ever capable of possessing. He speaks of England, our constitution preserves a unity in a so great a diversity of its parts. We have an inheritable crown, and inheritable peerage, and a House of Commons and a people inheriting privileges, franchises, and liberties form a long line of ancestors A spirit of innovation is generally the result of a selfish temper and confined views. People will not look forward to posterity who never looks backward to their ancestors. (Burke, 1987, p. 29)Burke believes that completely dissolving government and starting over with a blank slate is bound to fail, because a blank slate leaves no elements to form ideologies from, and is ignorant to the trials and errors of past governments. He uses the French revolution as an example, you chose to act as if you had never been molded into civil society and had everything to begin anew. You began ill, because you began by despising everything that belonged to you. You set up trade without a capital Respecting your forefathers, you would have been taught to respect yourselves. (Burke, 1987, p. 31)To clarify his expectations about successful and justified revolutions burke uses the example of the Glorious revolution of England in 1688. King James the Second was a Catholic king. He was accused of not representing the interests of the majority, since England was primarily of Protestant religion, and the King showed favoritism to Catholics. Burke explains the accusations against the King as,They who led the revolution grounded the virtual abdication of King James upon no light and uncertain principle. They charged him with nothing less than a design, confirmed by a multitude of illegal acts, to subvert the Protestant church and state, and their fundamental, unquestionable laws and liberties; they charged him with having broken the original contract between king and people. (Burke, 1987, p. 24)Burke admires this revolution because it was bloodless reform as opposed to violent rebellion. However, he admits that violence can be used to achieve change in government but only if absolutely necessary. In England it had become obvious that a change was needed in the government, and the people took only the necessary actions to complete the change and return the country to normal. King James abdicated the throne, and was replaced by a Protestant king. An irregular convulsive movement maybe necessary to throw off an irregular convulsive disease (Burke, 1987, p.22) the glorious revolution made great improvements in English government. Burke approves of the fact that the revolution did not begin until the leaders had accumulated evidence and facts that the King was irresponsible. The spirit of the revolution was not to dissolve society and begin anew, but had a more realistic spirit of eliminating the specific problem in the government while preserving societal institutions. they regenerated the deficient part of the old constitution through the parts that were not impaired. (Burke, 1987, p.19). This type of revolution provided stability for the English people; their rights were re-asserted in Declaration of Right, and the government was made more responsible to the people. They secured soon after the frequent meetings of parliament, by which the whole government would be under constant inspection and active control of the popular representatives and of the magistrates of the kingdom. (Burke, 1987, p. 24) Burke contrasts this example of effective revolution with The French revolution of 1789, which he believed was ill spirited and caused further problems in French society. He feels that the French did not have just cause to rebel,The French rebel against a mild and lawful monarch with more fury, outrage, and insult than ever any people has been known to rise against the most illegal usurper or the most sanguinary tyrant. Their resistance was made to concession, their revolt was from protection, and their blow was aimed at a hand holding out graces, favors, and immunities. (Burke, 1987, p. 34)Burke feels that their cause for revolution was unreasonable and foolish, rash and ignorant counsel in a time of profound peace. (Burke, 1987, p. 34) The National Assembly, the government created upon the execution of the King of France, had the potential to become tyrannous. Burke believes that since the assembly had been created form a blank slate it was a danger to society. That assembly, since the destruction of the orders, has no fundamental law, no strict convention, no respected usage to restrain it. Instead of finding themselves obliged to conform to a fixed constitution, they have a power to make a constitution which shall conform to their designs. Nothing in heave or earth can serve as a control on them. (Burke, 1987, p. 39)Locke feels that people will impose restraints of power on their government as they see fit. He fully supports the division of powers, and believes that tyranny is a worse state for society to be in than the tragedy of the commons. The reason behind this being that a tyrannical government may force its citizens to live a life without liberties, but the tragedy of the commons although a dark and unstable time, is a time without government, where each man has natural liberties by the law of nature. One of the commonly known reasons that the French people rebelled against their monarch, was because of the poor economy. However, Burke makes it clear that a poorly planned revolution can bring worse times than those of the past. They have found their punishment in their success: laws overturned; tribunals subverted; industry without vigor; commerce expiring; the revenue unpaid, yet the people impoverished; a church pillaged, and a state not relieved; civil and military anarchy made the constitution of the kingdom; everything human and divine sacrificed to the idol of public credit, and national bankruptcy the consequence (Burke, 1987, p. 34)People who are dissatisfied with their government, and considering revolution as a means of change must take both Burkes and Lockes positions into account. The individuals must define the rights that they feel entitled to, and decided if the government and society can reform to assert these rights. If they find revolution to be necessary, these individuals must decide what type of political situation would embody these rights through institutions and government actions. Both Burke and Locke see a need for revolution when government is ineffectual. However, they differ in opinion on how and when revolution should take place, because of their beliefs on what society is like without established government. Locke feels that the peoples return to the State of Nature is a chance to build a new civil society when they see fit, based on their desire to have their natural rights protected. Burke believes that there is no State of Nature for us to return to, escaping civil society is not possible. In order to preserve the lives of the people and the establishments that have been built by past governments, the government must be reformed rather than abolished. Thus summing it up I would say that the reflection of the ideas of Burke and Locke can definitely be seen today especially in democratic form of governments like our India. Both Burke and Locke talk on the aspects of Liberty, equality, self preservation, reason, and property. They believe that these aspects are a must for governments in order to sustain continuity and thus we do see all these aspects in a modern democratic system of a government. Burke and Locke believe that revolution is not the correct method to achieve things in a democracy. They say that governments shouldnt be thrown out by means of a revolution. Revolution to them is merely a way of bringing about a change in government by exercising out rights and privileges that the democratic government system offers to us and not by dissolving a government by means of revolution as per the meaning during the 17th century. Therefore Burke and Lockes ideas fit very well for new emerging, growing and existing democratic systems of government today and must be reviewed upon before taking extremist decisions like abolishing a government completely. And thus I see their ideas and views on revolution did have immense influence during the period they lived in and the importance of ideas and views of Burkes and Lockes continue to be of immense importance to governments today and tomorrow. BibliographyAyling, S. (1988). Edmund Burke: His life and opinions. New York: St. MartinsBurke, E. (1987). Reflections on the revolution in France. (reprint) Indianapolis: HackettLocke, J. (1980). Second treatise of government. (reprint) Indianapolis: Hackett.

Observation of a Track and Field Coach Essay -- Papers

Observation of a Track and Field Coach I chose to observe the practices at State College for Track and Field. I primarily focused on the distance team with John as the coach. When I arrived at the first practice I observed Coach John talking to the team at the beginning of their practice. He was going over what they should focus on during their first track meet, which was coming up. His positive attitude stood out the most. He put his emphasize on having fun. He stressed the importance that they work as hard as they can to achieve their best performance but his final words were, "Have fun!" I started to realize what he stressed most for his team and that was to achieve the goals they set for themselves. For both practices I attended the athletes started out with a warm-up run. They then met as a group and had the team captain lead in their stretches. I noticed strong team cohesion as they stretched talking about their activities from the previous weekend and the work out that they were going to have. After the stretching Coach gathered them together to explain the workout (both days a speed workout). As he explained he made sure each of the team members understood the exact instructions for the speed drills. One of the athletes had a question and he patiently answered it and encouraged more questions to make sure the team knew the exact workout. He had the lone male distance runner do 2 sets of 4x200 meter sprints on the track. He had the women's distance team go out to the pond's to run a 20-minute fartlek in which they ran a minute hard and a minute easy. I observed the male distance runner and when he finished his second set of 200's, Coach suggested he run one more set of 200's. Chris was tired and was he... ...en a coach and a friend and he recognizes that there needs to be a level of respect from the athletes. Reflecting on my interview with Coach comparing and contrasting his stated philosophy on coaching and what I have observed from practices and meets I saw that his goals as a coach are being met at practices and his interactions with his team. He knows what he wants to get out of his coaching experience and he achieves that by working hard at demanding respect and hard work from his team while still ensuring that they have fun. From what I have observed from Coach it seems as if he has taken this class. He knows so much about performance strategies as well as athlete motivation techniques and coach and athlete issues such as respect, safety, and personal relationships. Overall I was very impressed with Coachs coaching strategy, and his team performance.